Prognostic factors affecting mortality in elderly, low body mass index, and poor performance status groups with lung cancer: analysis of the 2016 Korean Association of Lung Cancer Registry (KALC-R) database
Rattachement africain : kr, in, ie. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Recent advancements in lung cancer treatment have brought about a paradigm shift that raises the possibility of treatment for populations who were previously not considered for lung cancer therapy. In light of these developments, it is necessary to reassess the treatment outcomes and feasibility of such advanced therapies in vulnerable populations. This study aims to provide real-world evidence on treatment outcomes across varying clinical conditions, with a focus on patients with frail conditions such as old age, low BMI, or reduced performance status, who are often underrepresented. Methods: This study analyzed data from the Korean Association of Lung Cancer Registry (KALC-R) cohort-the third nationwide survey, a multi-center cancer registry from 13 regional cancer centers and 38 hospitals from which significant number of registrations were made. In 2016, the KALC-R registered 2,808 patients who were newly diagnosed with lung cancer. Results: ). Conclusions: A select group of patients with vulnerable conditions, such as old age, low BMI, and poor performance status, may benefit from active anti-cancer treatment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prognostic factors affecting mortality in elderly, low body mass index, and poor performance status groups with lung cancer: analysis of the 2016 Korean Association of Lung Cancer Registry (KALC-R) database
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2025
- Éditeur
- AME Publishing Company
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.