A Review of Recent Advances in MgO-Based Cementitious Composites for Green Construction: Mechanical and Durability Aspects
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The construction industry, as a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, urgently requires sustainable development solutions to achieve the Net Zero Emission Goal. Magnesium oxide (MgO)-based cementitious composites have emerged as promising alternatives due to their ability to reduce environmental impact and their potential to enhance structural integrity. Despite these advantages, limitations such as poor resistance to harsh environmental conditions and concerns over long-term durability continue to restrict their broader application. To better understand these strengths and limitations, this review investigates the influence of MgO; supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as fly ash, silica fume, and rice husk ash. It also examines fibers, including polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), glass, sisal, and cellulose, and their effect on the mechanical and durability properties of MgO-based composites. Mechanical performance is assessed through compressive and tensile strength, while durability is evaluated in terms of porosity, permeability, water absorption, shrinkage (autogenous and drying), and carbonation resistance. Key challenges and future research directions to promote the use of MgO composites in sustainable construction are also identified.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Review of Recent Advances in MgO-Based Cementitious Composites for Green Construction: Mechanical and Durability Aspects
- Date Crossref
- 29/09/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.