Construction of a Spatiotemporal Knowledge Graph for Carbon Source and Sink Dynamics Driven by Multi-Source Sensing Collaboration
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Driven by global climate change and the “0Dual Carbon” goals, the precise analysis of spatiotemporal carbon sourcesink dynamics has become a central challenge in environmental governance. Traditional approaches relying on single data sources and static models often fail to adequately capture spatiotemporal heterogeneity. To address this, this study proposes a multi-source sensing collaborative-driven knowledge graph construction method for carbon source-sink dynamics. The framework integrates “space-air-ground-social” multi-source data to build a spatiotemporally continuous ontology model, featuring a four-dimensional representation system (semantic, spatial, temporal, and attribute features). It further incorporates domain knowledge-enhanced large language models to enable efficient extraction of unstructured text and structured data. Experimental results demonstrate that the method successfully achieves intelligent extraction of carbon-related entities and relationships from unstructured text, with the entity recognition accuracy of 92.3 %. A city-scale, dynamically updated carbon source-sink knowledge graph was constructed for Shenzhen, providing granular decision support for regional carbon sequestration potential assessment and emissions trading. This work advances carbon governance from an experience-driven to a data-driven paradigm.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Construction of a Spatiotemporal Knowledge Graph for Carbon Source and Sink Dynamics Driven by Multi-Source Sensing Collaboration
- Date Crossref
- 16/06/2025
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.