Alternative Conformation Prediction Using Deep Learning With Multi‐ MSA Strategy and Structural Clustering in CASP16
Rattachement africain : us, cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We report the results from the "MIEnsembles-Server" and "Zheng" groups for structure ensemble predictions in CASP16, both of which employed the EnsembleFold pipeline. Initially, multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) were generated using DeepMSA2 for proteins and rMSA for RNA targets. These MSAs were processed by newly developed deep learning methods-D-I-TASSER2 for protein monomer structure prediction, DMFold2 for protein complex structure prediction, ExFold for RNA structure prediction, and DeepProtNA for protein-nucleic acid complex structure prediction-to yield diverse structural decoys. The generated decoys were clustered into representative models corresponding to distinct conformational states using the structural clustering tool MolClust. Protein monomer targets underwent additional refinement via replica-exchange Monte Carlo (REMC) simulations with D-I-TASSER2, and these refined decoys were re-clustered with MolClust to finalize the ensemble predictions. For the 19 ensemble targets in CASP16, the final EnsembleFold models achieved an average TM-score of 0.657, representing improvements of 10.2% compared to the baseline AlphaFold3 program. Notably, EnsembleFold achieved particularly good performance for hybrid protein/nucleic-acid targets, leading to its efficacy in ensemble prediction tasks. Analysis of the resulting structural ensembles highlighted three significant insights: (i) Models derived from distinct DeepMSA2-generated MSAs typically represent different conformational states for ensemble targets; (ii) REMC simulations significantly enhance model diversity, facilitating the identification of alternative conformations; (iii) The structural clustering approach effectively identifies and selects accurate representative models for each conformational state. We further discuss potential improvements in Quality Assessment (QA) scoring methods that could further enhance the reliability and accuracy of ensemble predictions in the future.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Alternative Conformation Prediction Using Deep Learning With Multi‐ <scp>MSA</scp> Strategy and Structural Clustering in <scp>CASP16</scp>
- Date Crossref
- 27/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Michigan State University Department of Computer Science and Engineering pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Michigan Gilbert S Omenn Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Nankai University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Zhejiang University of Technology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
School of Statistics and Data Science NITFID pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
College of Information Engineering pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Computer Science and Engineering — Michigan State University, Gilbert S Omenn Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics — University of Michigan et Nankai University, avec 3 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.