Evidence of ecosystem process recovery across a large-scale coral reef restoration programme using AI accelerated soundscape analysis
Résumé fourni par la source
1. Abstract Coral reef restoration efforts are on the increase globally. However, reporting on the ecological outcomes of these efforts is rare and typically focuses on coral related metrics. As a result, understanding of whether restoration can recover broader aspects of reef functioning remains limited. In this study we use passive acoustic monitoring coupled with human-in-the-loop artificial intelligence to analyse >12 months of soundscape recordings from 45 sites across five biogeographically independent regions to investigate the impact of active restoration on reef functioning. We trained and rigorously evaluated machine learning models to identify 34 biological sound types within this data, generating >912,000 high-confidence detections. These detections were used to infer four key functions across healthy, degraded, early-stage (<3 months) and mid-stage (32–53 months) restored reefs. Restoration significantly enhanced: (i) biological sounds at night, key to recruiting juvenile fish; (ii) diversity of biological sounds, an indicator of fish community diversity; and (iii) snapping shrimp activity, an indicator of bioturbation. However, effects varied by region, and audible parrotfish grazing, key to algal control and bioerosion, did not differ among habitat types in four of the five regions. Our findings provide evidence that restoration can support recovery of broader ecosystem functioning when carefully implemented in the right contexts. Graphical abstract
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evidence of ecosystem process recovery across a large-scale coral reef restoration programme using AI accelerated soundscape analysis
- Date Crossref
- 26/09/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.