Impact of KMT2A Rearrangement on Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified, and Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL), not otherwise specified (NOS), share overlapping histology and T-follicular helper (TFH) biology but often show divergent outcomes and treatment needs. The clinical significance of KMT2A rearrangement (KMT2A-r) in nodal PTCL remains undefined. We aimed to investigate the clinicogenomic features and prognostic impact of KMT2A-r in AITL and PTCL-NOS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients diagnosed with AITL or PTCL-NOS between 2021 and 2024 at two centers. All patients underwent 523-gene DNA/RNA next-generation sequencing. Gene co-variation and diagnostic splits were summarized using network and decision-tree analyses. Results: Overall, 37 patients were included (AITL: 14; PTCL-NOS: 23), with similar baseline clinical characteristics. In AITL, TFH markers were more frequently expressed, and RHOA mutations were enriched. KMT2A-r occurred in 24% of cases without histology-specific enrichment. AITL showed better 2-year overall survival (OS) than PTCL-NOS (70.7% vs. 38.8%; p = 0.040) but similar progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate analysis revealed that KMT2A-r, lactate dehydrogenase elevation, and bone-marrow involvement predicted inferior PFS (Hazard ratio for KMT2A-r: 2.56). Median PFS was 5.9 versus 12.5 months in the KMT2A-r and non-KMT2A-r groups, respectively (p = 0.039). Brentuximab vedotin (BV) plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone did not significantly improve OS or PFS overall; however, exploratory analysis indicated improved PFS in the KMT2A-r subset. Conclusions: KMT2A-r delineates an adverse-risk biology in nodal PTCL, aligns with non-TFH genomic hubs and markers of tumor burden, and may serve as a stratifier and hypothesis-generating target for BV-based strategies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.