COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Experiences from the Republic of the Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau
Résumé fourni par la source
The rollout of COVID-19 vaccines marked a turning point in pandemic control, yet vaccine hesitancy emerged as a significant obstacle in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The study aims to investigate socio-behavioural drivers of vaccine hesitancy in three high-resistance countries: the Republic of Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau. By employing a qualitative ethnographic design, in the period from April to October 2022, the study enrolled 752 participants in semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, involving community leaders, women’s leaders, healthcare providers, traditional practitioners, traditional leaders, drivers, and youth leaders, ensuring diverse perspectives. Findings indicate that vaccine hesitancy is fluid and contextual with three principal drivers: (1) denial of COVID-19’s existence, often reinforced by scepticism among healthcare providers and the belief that the disease is foreign or a governmental scheme for financial gain; (2) misinformation, including rumours about vaccine incompatibility with certain foods, and fears of sterility and witchcraft; (3) a firm reliance on traditional medicine, seen as effective alternative to biomedical interventions. Vaccine hesitancy can only be addressed through culturally responsive, multisectoral approaches centred on community dialogue, improved communication, and the integration of trusted networks. Without inclusive strategies, resistance will undermine pandemic response and future health interventions in SSA.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Experiences from the Republic of the Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau
- Date Crossref
- 25/09/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.