Pulsed laser deposition of Ho2O3 thin films as Röntgen material for X-ray nano-photonics
Le résumé fourni par la source
Scalable and stoichiometrically controlled synthesis of epitaxial rare-earth oxide thin films is promising for advancing next-generation optoelectronic and quantum photonic technologies, including miniature X-ray laser systems. The growth of high-quality holmium oxide (Ho2O3) thin films on (001)-oriented yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) substrates via pulsed laser deposition (PLD) was investigated, employing both KrF excimer (248 nm) and frequency-doubled Nd:YAG (532 nm) laser sources. Detailed structural characterization using high-resolution X-ray diffraction and reciprocal space mapping confirms the formation of (00l)-oriented, relaxed epitaxial films with excellent crystallinity and lattice parameters closely matching bulk Ho2O3. The impact of laser wavelength on film quality and growth dynamics was investigated, revealing that the λ = 532 nm laser yields film quality comparable to that achieved with excimer-laser-grown films. Elemental analysis using oxygen-16 resonance Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) demonstrates precise control over the Ho:O stoichiometry under optimized deposition conditions. The successful use of both ultraviolet and visible laser sources highlights the versatility of PLD for rare-earth oxide film growth, while offering flexibility in equipment accessibility. This study establishes a scalable, tunable pathway for fabricating stoichiometric, epitaxial Ho2O3 thin films, with promising implications for X-ray nano-photonic devices.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pulsed laser deposition of Ho2O3 thin films as Röntgen material for X-ray nano-photonics
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.