Clinical and immunological factors influencing the onset and course of partial remission in pediatric type 1 diabetes
Rattachement africain : tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Purpose: This study examined key clinical and immunological factors influencing the onset and course of partial remission (PR) in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes(T1D). Materials and Methods: A total of 201 pediatric patients with T1D were enrolled. PR was defined as an insulin dose-adjusted HbA1c(IDAA1c) of≤9. Participants were categorized into two groups: PR and NR (non-remission). Results: Partial remission occurred in 138 (69%) patients. In the PR group, the mean age at diagnosis was 9.4 ± 3.8 years, with PR onset occurring 1.6 ± 1.4 months after diagnosis and lasting for a mean duration of 7.3 ± 5.2 months. Overweight/obesity was strongly associated with PR, as 81% of overweight/obese patients achieved remission. Anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (anti-GAD) antibody positivity was more frequent in the PR group (63.0% vs. 33.3%). Longer remission was seen in patients with puberty, overweight/obesity, or coeliac disease, whereas positivity for anti-GAD and islet cell antibodies was associated with shorter remission. Conclusion: Anti-GAD and ICA antibodies have distinct effects on PR, reflecting the complexity of autoimmune activity in pediatric T1D. The presence of obesity, puberty, and celiac disorder supports the need for a immuno-metabolic strategy for the early prediction and management of PR in pediatric T1D.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinical and immunological factors influencing the onset and course of partial remission in pediatric type 1 diabetes
- Date Crossref
- 30/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Cukurova Medical Journal
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.