Correlates of patient reported quality of life in a large multiple sclerosis cohort encompassing the COVID-19 pandemic period
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) as a complementary measure of disease burden in Multiple Sclerosis (MS), larger studies examining PROMs and their correlates over time, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, are rare. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, along with demographic and MS disease characteristics, on Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) and Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC) scores. METHODS: Cohort study comprising 1,213 individuals enrolled in the prospective COMBAT-MS study, contributing 8,371 and 7,798 MSIS-29 and FSMC questionnaires, respectively. A generalized estimating equation model was applied for the relationship between questionnaire scores and covariates. RESULTS: Questionnaires administered during and after COVID showed somewhat higher FSMC scores compared to the pre-pandemic period. No significant association was found between MSIS-29 scores and the questionnaire period. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was the strongest covariate positively associated with all subdomains of the questionnaires. Male sex was negatively associated with MSIS-29 psychological and FSMC scores. CONCLUSION: EDSS was the strongest predictor of both MSIS-29 and FSMC scores, while the COVID-19 pandemic exerted only limited impact. Findings underscore the importance of preventing accrual of disability to preserve quality of life in MS.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Correlates of patient reported quality of life in a large multiple sclerosis cohort encompassing the COVID-19 pandemic period
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.