Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Linking Pollution and Viral Risk: Detection of Dioxins and Coronaviruses in Cats and Dogs

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Viral and chemical analyses were performed on 80 dead cats and 51 dead dogs from the Campania Region (Southern Italy), with the aim of evaluating in vivo the potential correlation between coronavirus (CoV) infections and levels of environmental pollutants such as dioxins and PCSs (PCDD/F, DL-PCB and NDL-PCB). The overall viral prevalence was 16.3% in cats and 23.5% in dogs. Both feline coronavirus (FCoV) and canine coronavirus (CCoV) were identified, with variable detection rates in all the other organs investigated, supporting studies that provide evidence of systemic viral spread. The highest prevalence of coronaviruses (CoVs) was observed in Naples (19.2% for FCoV; 30.7% for CCoV) and Caserta (11.1% for FCoV; 50.0% for CCoV), areas that include municipalities with the highest Municipality Index of Environmental Pressure (MIEP) scores. Chemical analyses showed that DL-PCBs were present at more elevated concentrations in CoV-infected dogs and cats than in non-infected animals, whereas ∑NDL-PCB and ∑PCDD/F were detected in greater amounts in non-infected subjects. Among PCDDs, the congener 2,3,7,8-TCDD displayed different distribution patterns between infected and non-infected animals. In cats, 70.0% of FCoV-positive individuals had 2,3,7,8-TCDD levels above the limit of quantification (LOQ), compared with 38.0% of FCoV-negative cats. In dogs, 78.0% of CCoV-infected animals exceeded the LOQ, compared with 20.0% of non-infected ones; this difference was statistically significant. The results of the study suggest that elevated levels of 2,3,7,8-TCDD may be associated with CCoV infection and replication in dogs, suggesting a possible relationship between environmental pollution and susceptibility to coronavirus infections.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Linking Pollution and Viral Risk: Detection of Dioxins and Coronaviruses in Cats and Dogs
Date Crossref
19/09/2025
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • University of Naples Federico II Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Experimental Zooprofilactic Institute of Southern Italy pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • and the Correlation Study Among Environment National Reference Center for the Analysis pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production — University of Naples Federico II et Experimental Zooprofilactic Institute of Southern Italy, avec 1 autre affiliation.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingAnimal Virus Infections Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.