Surfaceome CRISPR activation screening uncovers ligands regulating tumor sensitivity to NK cell killing

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Natural killer (NK) cell-based immunotherapies represent a promising avenue for cancer treatment due to their ability to eliminate cancer cells independently of antigen presentation and potential for “off-the-shelf” use. However, the molecular determinants governing tumor cell susceptibility to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity remain incompletely understood. Here we employed CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) screening to systematically identify cancer cell surface regulators of NK cell killing across multiple cancer types. Using a comprehensive surfaceome-focused library, we screened human and murine cancer cell lines co-cultured with NK cells, identifying both known and novel ligands that modulate NK cell cytotoxicity. Our screens revealed established factors including CD43 (encoded by SPN ), while uncovering previously uncharacterized regulators such as CD44, PDPN, and Siglec-1/CD169. Validation through complementary cDNA overexpression and genetic knockout approaches confirmed that disruption of CD43, CD44, PDPN, and Siglec-1 significantly altered cancer cell susceptibility to NK killing both in vitro and in humanized mouse models. Analysis of clinical datasets show that expression of identified factors correlates with patient survival outcomes in an NK-context dependent manner supporting their therapeutic relevance. Most notably, our mechanistic studies demonstrate that CD43-mediated NK cell resistance operates independently of its previously proposed interaction with Siglec-7 on NK cells. Furthermore, we find that targeting CD43 on either NK cells or engineered T cells substantially enhances their cytotoxic activity against leukemia cell lines. These results establish gain-of-function screening as a powerful approach for discovering immunoregulatory surface proteins and identify multiple promising targets for enhancing NK cell-based cancer immunotherapies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.