Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Ambivalent Affinities: A Political History of Blackness and Homosexuality after World War II

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

In a 2015 manifesto, Patrisse Cullors and Alicia Garza—both identified as queer women of color—wrote that they originally envisioned the Black Lives Matter movement to be at the interstices of race, sexuality, and gender identity. They wrote that queer people of color “are at the table, on the stage, [and] in the protests” but this has “not been without its challenges, and the movement has had to deal with queer and trans antagonism both from the broader public and within movement spaces” (Patrisse Cullors and Alicia Garza, “About Black Lives Matter,” 2015, blacklivesmatter.com). Jennifer Dominique Jones argues in Ambivalent Affinities that we can locate contemporary U.S. intersectionality in a post–World War II era that imbricated anti-Black racism, homophobia, and transphobia but also constellated Black liberation movements and queer movements. These imbrications and constellations, however, were never easily managed and, in fact, were quite messy. Jones tells the story of the postwar relationship between Blackness and queerness through a multitude of agents—from civil rights organizations, queer activists, and Black political officials to white supremacists, political conservatives, and governmental bodies. Outlining “how ideas about same-sex intimacy and gender nonconformity … emerged within political contests over white supremacy and Black racial equality,” she engages case studies that discuss the often-contradictory discourses of prejudice and liberation, sometimes from within Black and queer movements themselves (p. 4). These cases range internally from National Association for the Advancement of Colored People efforts to confront homophobia and transphobia during the 1950s lavender scare and the National Urban League's use of antiqueer moral panic to the external rhetorics of White Citizens' Councils and the American Nazi party that vilified both Black and queer lifeways, conflating both with a nonnormativeness that demanded estrangement, if not a cruel social death. Jones's final cases also illustrate a late twentieth-century effort by Black activists to slowly and steadily build coalitions with queer communities through Gay Pride Day deliberations and Hiv/Aids (human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome) educational activism. From the many episodes examined in the volume, readers will gain a sense of the complications that have led us to what might be called our contemporary “intersectional presents/presence.”

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Ambivalent Affinities: A Political History of Blackness and Homosexuality after World War II
Date Crossref
01/09/2025
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Race, History, and American Society

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.