Robust prognostics of impacted composite structures using an adaptive hidden semi-Markov model

Le résumé fourni par la source

Prognostics and health management (PHM) is becoming increasingly important as engineering structures and systems grow more complex. Many of these systems lack accurate physical models to describe their degradation, especially in unpredictable scenarios. To meet safety regulations, robust prognostic models are needed to transform sensor data into reliable predictions about a system’s remaining useful life (RUL). This study presents the adaptive hidden semi-Markov model (AHSMM), a novel probabilistic approach that enhances RUL prediction accuracy, uncertainty quantification (UQ), and reliability assessment compared to a long short-term memory (LSTM) model. A key contribution is an in-house experimental campaign involving glass fiber-reinforced polymer specimens subjected to fatigue loading and multiple impact events at different locations and time intervals. Unlike traditional models that rely on data from similar damage histories, the AHSMM is trained exclusively on unimpacted specimens and tested on multiply impacted ones, showcasing its adaptability to previously unseen conditions. The study also introduces a new prognostic performance measure tailored to AHSMM and develops a conditional reliability analysis for both AHSMM and LSTM predictions. Results demonstrate that AHSMM consistently outperforms LSTM across all evaluation metrics. It achieves a 24% lower RMSE over the full lifetime and superior UQ, with an average coverage of 0.79 compared to 0.17 for LSTM. Conditional reliability analysis further shows that AHSMM provides more accurate and stable reliability estimates as data accumulates. By capturing the degradation process and adapting to evolving conditions, AHSMM strengthens prognostic robustness. This study highlights the need for robust PHM models that can handle real-world uncertainties and contribute to advancements in the aerospace, automotive, and defense industries.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.