Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Short-Term Differences in Hospital Resource Utilization and Quality of Care Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A National Propensity-Scored Observational Study Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP Database

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background/Objective: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are common treatments for cervical radiculopathy. This study compared post-operative outcomes between ACDF and PCF utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Methods: An observational study following STROBE and TRIPOD + AI guidelines compared hospital resource utilization and quality of care between single-level ACDF and PCF (2005–2022). Primary outcomes compared operative time, length of stay (LOS), and post-operative complications. Propensity-scored stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted for confounders, specifically demographics, lifestyle-related factors, pre-operative labs, pre-existing comorbidities, and surgery-related factors. Subgroup analysis compared baseline characteristics and outcomes, stratified by 30-day re-admission and re-operation. Results: PCF group demonstrated shorter LOS (MD −0.7 days, 95% CI −0.9 to −0.5 days, p < 0.001), operative time (MD −32.9 min, 95% CI −35.7 to −30.1 min, p < 0.001), higher rate of re-admission associated with overall SSI (PD 1.2%, 95% CI 0.7–1.7%, p < 0.001), deep incisional SSI (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4–1.2%, p < 0.001), and organ/space SSI (PD 0.3%, 95% CI 0.0–0.5%, p = 0.011). Furthermore, the PCF group had greater systemic sepsis (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4–1.3%, p < 0.001), overall post-operative SSI (PD 2.8%, 95% CI 2.0–3.6%, p < 0.001), superficial SSI (PD 1.9%, 95% CI 1.2–2.5%, p < 0.001), and deep incisional SSI (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4–1.2%, p < 0.001) rates. Subgroup analysis showed increased early post-operative re-operation rates in the PCF cohort (PD 23.4%, 95% CI 9.5–37.4%, p = 0.001) and increased early post-operative re-admission associated with post-operative overall SSI (PD 35.3%, 95% CI 22.7–48.0%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although the PCF cohort demonstrated lower hospital utilization, it had reduced quality of care and increased post-operative complications.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Short-Term Differences in Hospital Resource Utilization and Quality of Care Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A National Propensity-Scored Observational Study Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP Database
Date Crossref
12/09/2025
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cervical and Thoracic MyelopathySpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologySpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.