The psychometric properties of the working memory questionnaire in a South African young adult sample
Rattachement africain : Afrique du Sud. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The Working Memory Questionnaire (WMQ) was developed to assess everyday difficulties associated with working memory (WM) impairments. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the WMQ within a South African context. A cross-sectional research design was employed. Healthy young adults (n = 256) completed the WMQ and a demographic questionnaire online. A subsample (n = 69) also completed performance-based WM tasks (n-Back Task, Digit Span, and Symbol Span tests). The WMQ demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91), with significant intercorrelations among domains. Gender and language emerged as relevant demographic variables: females reported greater symptom severity in storage and executive domains, and first-language English speakers reported higher levels of perceived difficulties in the attention domain and WMQ total score. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) did not support the original three-factor structure and the evidence for concurrent validity was limited. Statistically significant negative correlations between the WMQ Storage domain and all the n-Back tasks and the averaged z-scores of the WM tests were found. Only the 3-Back Task significantly and negatively correlated with all the WMQ scores. These findings support the internal reliability of the WMQ but put into question the applicability of its theoretical structure and concurrent validity for the South African context.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The psychometric properties of the working memory questionnaire in a South African young adult sample
- Date Crossref
- 17/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.