Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary outcomes of the Parents Under Pressure program: a Canadian pilot study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ca, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction The perinatal period is crucial for mothers and their offspring with various determinants of health that may influence experiences and susceptibility to negative outcomes. Programs, like Parents under Pressure (PuP) have been designed to reach at-risk mothers and improve well-being among mothers and their children, specifically during the first two years of life. Objectives This study primarily examined the feasibility and acceptability of the PuP program among at-risk women in Canada during their perinatal period. Secondary objectives included assessing changes in key functioning domains over time. Methods A mixed methods study was conducted in Ontario and Quebec, Canada from January 2021-March 2023. Mothers were recruited from five community agencies. Quantitative data were collected from mothers over four study visits. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset of mothers and PuP service providers. Data on the program’s feasibility and acceptability, domains of functioning including mental health, substance use, and parenting were analyzed. Results Fifty-five mothers consented to participating in the PuP program, with 51 completing the baseline assessment. The study met the research retention threshold, with 83 % of mothers completing the final research study (post-5 month) visit. However, only 64 % (n = 34) met the clinical retention threshold for the PuP program (6 + modules or provider completed the closure module). Reasons for incompletion including life changes and loss of interest in the program. Qualitative interviews indicated the program was acceptable to both mothers and providers and identified barriers to implementation. Discussion While the PuP program was well-received by both mothers and providers, its feasibility in this context was limited, potentially due to the high-risk characteristics of the sample or external factors such as staff turnover. Future studies may consider adapting the program to include group-based or online components to better meet mothers’ needs.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary outcomes of the Parents Under Pressure program: a Canadian pilot study
Date Crossref
01/12/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • McMaster University Offord Centre for Child Studies pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Oxford Policy Management pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University of Oxford Department of Social Policy and Intervention pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Offord Centre for Child Studies — McMaster University, Oxford Policy Management et Department of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences — Faculty of Health Sciences, avec 1 autre affiliation.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild Abuse and Trauma

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.