Human and societal transformations are critical for food system responses to the climate crisis
Résumé fourni par la source
Faced with the growing climate crisis, there are calls for transformative adaptation, a climate response that addresses the root causes of vulnerability and requires radical change in food systems. Transformation of food systems is hence essential to deal with the ongoing climate crisis and to fulfil wider sustainability and development challenges from local to global scales. Transformed food systems must minimise vulnerability to shocks while delivering environmental, social and economic benefits. This need can only be met by embracing food system transformation as a process of social and individual change that contributes to transformative adaptation. The scale of this societal and environmental challenge demands an equally grand vision—one that integrates climate, sustainability and systems thinking with human psychology, beliefs and values, and shared understandings. Such a vision, with community and individual transformation at its core, has the potential to deliver multiple benefits to society through transformative food system change, livelihood resilience and climate change adaptation and mitigation. Fostering conditions that support both individual transformation and the development of collective understanding therefore needs to be a core part of any strategies to transform food systems. In this opinion piece, we provide a framework to guide this transformative drive towards societal climate resilience.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Human and societal transformations are critical for food system responses to the climate crisis
- Date Crossref
- 09/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.