Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Time to the first relapse after the transcranial magnetic stimulation with H7-coil in patients with predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia; A randomized, sham controlled trial

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : hr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction Patients with predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia experience severe functional impairment and limited response to pharmacological treatments. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has shown potential for treating negative symptoms, but its impact on long-term outcomes, such as time to relapse, remains underexplored. Objectives This study aimed to determine whether TMS with an H7-coil prolongs time to first relapse compared to sham stimulation in patients with low positive symptomatology and predominant negative symptoms. Methods This study was a randomized, sham-controlled trial at the Psychiatric Clinic Sveti Ivan, Zagreb, Croatia. The target population were patients with PANSS negative symptoms score > 24 and PANSS positive symptoms score < 20, on stable pharmacotherapy for at least three months The intervention group received high-frequency TMS with an H7-coil, while the control group received sham stimulation, both applied once daily for 20 sessions over four weeks. The outcome was time to first psychiatric relapse, defined as psychiatric rehospitalization. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for statistical comparisons. Results A total of 76 outpatients with schizophrenia, aged 18-55 were included; 33% were women. Over the 12-month follow-up, 29% in the H7 group and 24% in the sham group experienced a relapse. The median time to relapse was not reached in either group. The hazard ratio (HR) for relapse in the H7 group relative to sham was 0.82 (95% CI 0.34; 1.97), suggesting no significant effect of TMS on delaying relapse. Adjusted Cox regression model for age, gender, baseline severity of negative and positive symptoms, pharmacotherapy, and number of prior hospitalizations showed similar results (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.30; 2.46, p = 0.769). Significant predictors of relapse were baseline severity of negative symptoms (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.79; 0.99, p = 0.026) and the number of prior hospitalizations (HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.16; 2.82, p = 0.009). Conclusions No significant effect of H7-coil TMS on delaying relapse was observed in patients with schizophrenia and predominant negative symptoms. Median survival was not reached in either group, suggesting the need for longer follow-up to fully evaluate potential benefits. Baseline severity of negative symptoms and prior hospitalizations should be considered when assessing relapse risk in this patient population. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Time to the first relapse after the transcranial magnetic stimulation with H7-coil in patients with predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia; A randomized, sham controlled trial
Date Crossref
01/04/2025
Éditeur
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.