The origin and diversification of Amaryllidaceae: A phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis

Le résumé fourni par la source

PREMISE: Previous angiosperm-wide studies estimated that the geophytic family Amaryllidaceae diverged in Africa 87.00-46.77 million years ago (mya), spanning the Cretaceous and Palaeogene periods, including multiple important climatic and geological events. Greater precision on when and where this divergence occurred is lacking due to limited sampling of Amaryllidaceae and the paucity of the monocot fossil record. A robust phylogeny is required to estimate the age and origin of suprageneric groups; however, the evolutionary relationships within Amaryllidaceae are unclear. METHODS: We used 78 plastome protein-coding genes to infer the phylogenetic relationships of Amaryllidaceae and estimated the age of the family using four fossils and five secondary calibration points from across the Asparagales. We conducted a new biogeographic analysis to determine the ancestral origins of Amaryllidaceae and suprageneric groups, providing insights into the drivers of diversification. RESULTS: Our phylogenetic analyses recovered Amaryllidaceae as monophyletic, with Agapanthoideae sister to Amaryllidoideae and Allioideae. We estimate that Amaryllidaceae diverged in southern Africa 48.6 mya (50.3-46.6 mya) during the early Eocene, a period of elevated global temperatures with increasing seasonal aridity. Our biogeographic analyses indicate that taxa migrated from Africa via the Arabian Peninsula to temperate Asia and beyond during the Miocene. CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive taxon sampling across Amaryllidaceae, the greater number of genes, and the placement of fossils has made it possible to substantially refine estimates of lineage divergence. Establishing a robust age estimate and reconstructing the biogeographic history has led to a better understanding of evolution within the family, of present-day distributions, and of possible drivers of diversification.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.