Human factor in the use of automated insulin delivery systems: Real-world effects in children with type 1 diabetes after 2 years of use (AID-A study)
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
AIMS: This study aimed to assess the metabolic effects, changes in daily life, and diabetes burden associated with automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in children in a real-world setting after 2 years of use. METHODS: Longitudinal glycaemic data (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c], time in range [TiR], time below range [TbR], glucose management indicator [GMI]), body mass index (BMI), and AID system usage were collected from 111 children with type 1 diabetes at 12 and 24 months of AID use. After 1 year, adolescents and parents completed questionnaires on diabetes-related distress (P-PAID-C, P-PAID-T, and PAID-T) and experienced changes. RESULTS: Regardless of age or previous therapy, the HbA1c level decreased from 8.1 % (65 mmol/mol) to 7.7 % (61 mmol/mol), TiR increased from 55 % to 64 %, TbR decreased from 2.6 % to 1.8 %, and GMI (7.6 % vs. 7.3 %) improved after 1 year. After 2 years, HbA1c (7.6 % [60 mmol/mol]), TiR (62 %), TbR (1.3 %), and GMI (7.4 %) levels stabilised. Adolescents and parents reported improvements in daily life (i.e. sleep, stress, fear of hypoglycaemia). However, the BMI-SDS scores increased in the first year. CONCLUSIONS: AID system use is associated with clinically relevant improvements in glycaemic control and decrease in daily diabetes-related burden on affected children and their parents.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Human factor in the use of automated insulin delivery systems: Real-world effects in children with type 1 diabetes after 2 years of use (AID-A study)
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.