Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Incidence of Complications and Parental Satisfaction Following Pain Relief Methods in Paediatric Herniotomy: Caudal Block Versus Pre-incisional Field Block and Diclofenac Suppository Approach

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : Nigéria. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Introduction: Acute post-operative pain is one of the most common adverse effects of surgery experienced by children following herniotomy. Methods of managing this adverse effect include the use of caudal block, pre-incisional field block, and parenteral analgesics. We therefore sought to determine the incidence of complications and parental satisfaction following caudal block versus combination of pre-incisional field block and rectal diclofenac suppository for post-herniotomy analgesia. Materials and Methods: This was a randomised single-blind controlled clinical trial carried out in the Modular theatre of the Jos University Teaching Hospital. Fifty-eight children aged 1–6 years scheduled for elective day case open unilateral inguinal herniotomy with an American society of anesthesiologists of I and II were recruited and randomised into groups A and B; 1 mL/kg of 0.25% plain bupivacaine was administered caudally to group A, while 1 mL/kg of 0.25% plain bupivacaine and 1 mg/kg of diclofenac suppository were administered via pre-incisional field block to group B. Presence of complications such as nausea, vomiting, and pain was noted. Parental satisfaction with post-operative analgesia was assessed using a 5-point Likert item. Data collected were analysed using the SPSS. Results: Patients in the two study groups were comparable with respect to the measured parameters. Two (6.9%) patients in the caudal block group experienced vomiting, while three (10.3%) patients in both study groups had hypotension. Twenty-six (89.7%) and 19 (65.5%) parents in the caudal block group and field block with diclofenac suppository group were, respectively, “very satisfied” ( P = 0.0001). No parent was either dissatisfied or extremely dissatisfied. Conclusion: Both caudal block with plain bupivacaine and pre-incisional field block with plain bupivacaine plus diclofenac suppository showed comparable efficacy in the incidence of minimal complications. No parent was either dissatisfied or extremely dissatisfied with the techniques.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Incidence of Complications and Parental Satisfaction Following Pain Relief Methods in Paediatric Herniotomy: Caudal Block Versus Pre-incisional Field Block and Diclofenac Suppository Approach
Date Crossref
06/09/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Anesthesia and Pain ManagementPediatric Pain Management TechniquesCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.