Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Effect of neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant systemic therapy on survival in patients with surgical resected limited stage small-cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective cohort study from SEER database

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: The role of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is unknown but promising. This real-world study aimed to investigate the prospects of applying neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable limited-stage SCLC. Methods: Patients diagnosed with stage I-III SCLC who underwent surgical resection of primary tumor were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2007-2021). Survival outcomes were compared between neoadjuvant and adjuvant cohorts before and after matching. Multivariate Cox and Fine and Gray's competing risk regression models were built to identify prognostic factors and to adjust for covariates in subgroup analyses. Results: A total of 1,702 surgical resected SCLC were included in the study, among which 1,132 (67%) were treated with adjuvant therapy, while 55 (3%) received neoadjuvant therapy. Compared to adjuvant therapy, patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were significantly younger but exhibited more advanced tumor stages. In entire cohort, multivariate analyses showed that neoadjuvant therapy was independent favorable prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) =0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.99, P=0.04]; however, the mortality reduction for lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) was not significant [subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) =0.83, 95% CI: 0.56-1.23, P=0.35]. Subgroup analyses indicated that patients with more advanced tumor stages tended to derive greater survival benefits from neoadjuvant systemic therapy. In matched cohort, neoadjuvant therapy was significantly associated with both improved OS (log-rank P=0.04) and LCSS (Fine and Gray's P=0.04) in stage III cohort. Conclusions: In the real world, neoadjuvant systemic therapy was associated with improved survival in surgical resected SCLC, especially for those with stage III disease. This indicates that neoadjuvant therapy might be a promising treatment modality for resectable locally advanced SCLC.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Effect of neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant systemic therapy on survival in patients with surgical resected limited stage small-cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective cohort study from SEER database
Date Crossref
01/09/2025
Éditeur
AME Publishing Company
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Lung Cancer Research StudiesIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal MalignanciesNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.