Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Antifungal Prescribing in European Pediatric Intensive Care Units: Results of a Multinational 3-Month Weekly Point-Prevalence Survey

3Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
29Institutions déclarées
14Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gr, sa, ae, es, tr, it, gb, us, au, de, ru, at, ie, hu. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Critically ill pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are highly vulnerable to infections, including invasive fungal diseases and antifungal agents are frequently prescribed. Little is known about antifungal usage in PICUs across Europe. METHODS: A multinational 3-month weekly point-prevalence study for measuring antifungal drug use was organized. Eigtheen PICUs (16 hospitals) in 10 countries in the European region participated. All patients hospitalized in the participating PICUs and receiving systemic antifungals were included. Information about ward demographics was collected once; weekly ward and patient data were collected prospectively for the 12-week study period and entered in REDCap database. RESULTS: Among 18 PICUs, 8 (44%) followed prophylactic practices for targeted group of patients, 7/18 (39%) had an antifungal stewardship program and the majority (16/18, 89%) had the capacity of biomarker utilization (16/16 galactomannan, 13/16 beta-D-glucan, and 9/16 pan-fungal PCR). One hundred one courses in equal number of patients were recorded; 14 for patients aged <3 month, 87 for patients ≥3 month. Malignancy was the most common underlying condition among patients aged ≥3 month (29%) followed by surgery/trauma (25%), whereas all patients <3 month had undergone a recent surgery. Indication for antifungal prescribing was prophylaxis in 38% and treatment in 62% [empirical (57%), preemptive (13%), and targeted (30%)]. Fluconazole was the most common agent both for prophylaxis and treatment, whereas liposomal amphotericin B was the most frequent agent for targeted treatment. The majority (63%) of patients on prophylaxis were oncology or transplant patients. Common reasons for empirical and targeted treatment were persistent fever/other signs of infections in high-risk patients (61%) and Candida infections (100%), respectively. For targeted treatment, the most frequent pathogens were Candida albicans (37%) and Candida parapsilosis (32%). CONCLUSIONS: Most antifungal prescriptions across European PICUs were for treatment. Fluconazole was the most frequently prescribed antifungal. These surveillance data can guide antifungal stewardship strategies in PICUs.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Antifungal Prescribing in European Pediatric Intensive Care Units: Results of a Multinational 3-Month Weekly Point-Prevalence Survey
Date Crossref
10/09/2025
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesInsects and Parasite Interactions

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.