Energizing sulfur chemistry: Synergistic modulation of oxygen vacancies and heterointerface in MoO 2– x -Mo 2 C@NC for long-lasting lithium-sulfur batteries
Le résumé fourni par la source
The practical deployment of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries is impeded by severe polysulfide shuttle effects and sluggish redox kinetics. The use of heterostructures as catalysts in sulfur hosts is expected to improve the electrochemical performance of Li-S batteries. However, single heterostructures still suffer from the fatal problems of few active sites and high charge transfer barriers. Herein, defect-engineered MoO2–x-Mo2C@NC (NC is the abbreviation form of nitrogen-doped carbon) is designed as an efficient electrocatalyst to adjust the surface properties and electron distribution of the heterostructure by introducing a defective structure into the heterostructure, thereby enhance active site exposure. The d-orbitals of Mo2C facilitate strong interactions with the p-electrons of MoO2, enabling efficient electron transfer between reactants and active sites. DFT calculations confirm the interaction of the d orbitals of Mo2C with the p electrons in the MoO2 material, effectively lowering the reaction energy barrier. As a result, the S/MoO2–x-Mo2C@NC exhibits remarkable cycle stability, retaining a specific capacity of 714 mAh·g–1 after 500 cycles at 0.5 C. This work provides insights into defect-driven heterostructure design for advanced Li-S batteries.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Energizing sulfur chemistry: Synergistic modulation of oxygen vacancies and heterointerface in MoO <sub> 2– <i>x</i> </sub> -Mo <sub>2</sub> C@NC for long-lasting lithium-sulfur batteries
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Tsinghua University Press
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.