Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Seeking a Viable Alternative: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double‐Blind Non‐Inferiority Study of Oral Versus IV Dexamethasone in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Tonsillectomy is associated with a high rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), ranging between 40% and 73%, and dexamethasone has been found to have a prophylactic effect on PONV in children undergoing tonsillectomy. In 2020, there was a sudden, severe shortage of intravenous dexamethasone given its role in treating patients with COVID-19. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the viability of an alternative: non-inferiority of oral versus intravenous dexamethasone for preventing PONV. Secondary objectives included pain and surgical complication outcomes. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients aged 3 to 7 years old undergoing tonsillectomy were prospectively randomized to receive 0.5 mg/kg oral or intravenous dexamethasone (maximum dose 8 mg). PONV data were recorded from the post-anesthesia care unit and post-op day 3 to 5 nursing phone calls. Pain was assessed using the numeric pain scale 0 to 10 or the Faces, Legs, Arms, Crying, Consolability (FLACC) Scale. RESULTS: Seventy-two (57.1%) males and 54 (42.9%) females with a mean age of 5.36 years were included in the analysis. Sixty-three (50.0%) patients received oral dexamethasone, and 63 patients received intravenous dexamethasone. Three patients were noted to have nausea in the post-anesthesia care unit, all of whom received oral dexamethasone (2.4%), an absolute risk difference of 4.8% (95% CI 1.6% to 9.5%). Four patients had vomiting in the post-anesthesia care unit, all of whom received oral dexamethasone (3.2%), an absolute risk difference of 6.3% (95% CI 1.6% to 11.1%). Fifteen patients reported nausea and vomiting after discharge; 6/15 (40%) received oral dexamethasone and 9/15 (60%) received intravenous dexamethasone (absolute risk difference -5.4% (95% CI -15.6% to 4.9%)). DISCUSSION: Substituting oral dexamethasone in place of intravenous dexamethasone resulted in a non-inferior rate of PONV for pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Oral dexamethasone is a reasonable substitute for intravenous dexamethasone, particularly during an immediate, unexpected medication shortage.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.

Titre Crossref
Seeking a Viable Alternative: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double‐Blind Non‐Inferiority Study of Oral Versus <scp>IV</scp> Dexamethasone in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy
Date Crossref
08/09/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Nausea and vomiting managementAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesPediatric Pain Management Techniques

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.