Excitatory cortical neurons from CDKL5 deficiency disorder patient-derived organoids show early hyperexcitability not identified in neurogenin2 induced neurons

Le résumé fourni par la source

CDKL5 deficiency disorder (CDD) is a rare developmental and epileptic encephalopathy resulting from variants in cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5) that lead to impaired kinase activity or loss of function. CDD is one of the most common genetic etiologies identified in epilepsy cohorts. To study how CDKL5 variants impact human neuronal activity, gene expression and morphology, CDD patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells and their isogenic controls were differentiated into excitatory neurons using either an NGN2 induction protocol or a guided cortical organoid differentiation. Patient-derived neurons from both differentiation paradigms had decreased phosphorylated EB2, a known molecular target of CDKL5. Induced neurons showed no detectable differences between cases and isogenic controls in network activity using a multielectrode array, or in MAP2+ neurite length, and only two genes were differentially expressed. However, patient-derived neurons from the organoid differentiation showed increased synchrony and weighted mean firing rate on the multielectrode array within the first month of network maturation. CDD patient-derived cortical neurons had lower expression of CDKL5 and HS3ST1, which may change the extracellular matrix around the synapse and contribute to hyperexcitability. Similar to the induced neurons, there were no differences in neurite length across or within patient-control cell lines. Induced neurons have poor cortical specification while the organoid derived neurons expressed cortical markers, suggesting that the changes in neuronal excitability and gene expression are specific to cortical excitatory neurons. Examining molecular mechanisms of early hyperexcitability in cortical neurons is a promising avenue for identification of CDD therapeutics.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.