Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

252. ACCURACY OF PREDICTING RESIDUAL DISEASE AND DISEASE PROGRESSION DURING ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

1Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
14Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background In patients with esophageal cancer and a clinical complete response (CCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) active surveillance is non-inferior to standard surgery. However, two-thirds of patients have residual disease detected 12 weeks after nCRT and proceed to surgery. In addition, of the patients with CCR 12 weeks after nCRT, nearly half will develop locoregional regrowth at a later time point. We aim to identify predictive factors for achieving (persistent) CCR to improve selection of patients for active surveillance. Methods Data from the SANO-trial were analyzed, including patients who underwent nCRT for esophageal cancer. Logistic regression assessed predictors of CCR at 12 weeks, with potential factors including age, sex, WHO performance status, clinical T- and N-category, histology, differentiation grade, tumor location, and length. For patients with CCR in active surveillance, cause-specific proportional hazards regression identified predictors of sustained CCR (no locoregional regrowth, dissemination, or death) during a minimum two-year follow-up. Discrimination was quantified using the c-statistic with bootstrap validation. Results Of 750 patients, 274 (37%) achieved CCR at 12 weeks. Higher cN-category was associated with lower CCR likelihood (cN2–3 vs. cN0: OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.37–0.88, P < 0.01; c-statistic 0.56). Among 198 patients in active surveillance, 29% sustained CCR after a median follow up of 34 months (IQR:30–40). Higher cN-category (cN2–3 versus cN0: HR 2.08, 95%CI 1.25–3.48, P < 0.01) and adenocarcinoma (squamous cell carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma: HR 0.58, 95%CI 0.34–0.97, P = 0.04) were associated with non-sustained CCR (c-statistic 0.58). Conclusion Standard clinical and tumor parameters are weak predictors of clinical response and the persistence thereof after nCRT. New predictive parameters and better diagnostic tests should be explored to improve patient selection for active surveillance and personalize active surveillance strategies in patients with esophageal cancer.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
252. ACCURACY OF PREDICTING RESIDUAL DISEASE AND DISEASE PROGRESSION DURING ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER
Date Crossref
01/08/2025
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Esophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.