Evaluating repeat transurethral resection after en bloc resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objective: Many studies have stressed the necessity of repeat transurethral resection (reTURB) following the initial conventional transurethral resection of the bladder for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients. However, there have been few studies focusing on the role of reTURB after en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) for NMIBC by far. This study aimed to evaluate whether reTURB can be avoided after ERBT. Materials and methods: We conducted research in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to November 14, 2024, to identify studies on the reTURB after initial ERBT. For data conversion and the combined calculation of the incidence rate, we utilized R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and Cochrane Review Manager 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK) along with the double arcsine method. This systematic review protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under number 1082989. Results: A total of 17 studies involving 1051 participants were included. The rates of residual tumor and tumor upstaging detected by reTURB or cystoscopy after ERBT were 9% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 4%–16%) and 0% (95% CI = 0%–1%). No statistically significant positive effect of reTURB after initial ERBT was exhibited in recurrence-free survival (RFS), tumor recurrence, and progression. The pooled hazard ratios of 1-year and 5-year RFS were 0.77 (95% CI = 0.41–1.44, p = 0.41) and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.58–1.20, p = 0.33). The pooled odds ratio of progression and recurrence were 1.13 (95% CI = 0.53–2.41, p = 0.75) and 0.78 (95% CI = 0.53–1.16, p = 0.23). Conclusion: ERBT can successfully regulate the rate of tumor upstaging and residual tumor to an acceptable level. For patients with NMIBC, subsequent reTURB may not be required following the initial ERBT.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.