Effect of Dietary Intervention With Berries on Anthropometric Indices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials
Résumé fourni par la source
CONTEXT: Cardiovascular protective properties of berries have been reported in numerous studies. Berries and their bioactive compounds may also be effective for improving body composition and anthropometric indices. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis were aimed to investigate the effect of berries on anthropometric markers. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search for studies published before June 2024 was conducted in 4 electronic databases-PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar-to find randomized controlled trials that used berries or their extract as the intervention. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from 42 intervention arms from 38 studies were included in the analysis. DATA ANALYSIS: The meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant decrease in body mass index (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.13 [95% CI, -0.22 to -0.04]; P = .004) and in body fat percentage (WMD = -0.50 [95% CI, -0.77 to -0.23]; P = .000) and body fat mass (WMD = -0.67 [95% CI, -1.19 to -0.16]; P = .010). No significant changes were observed in weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, or fat-free mass. CONCLUSION: The results indicate the potential of berries to improve body mass index and body fat percentage; however, due to limited data, more well-designed studies are recommended. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration No. CRD42024556011.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effect of Dietary Intervention With Berries on Anthropometric Indices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials
- Date Crossref
- 07/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.