Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

The Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury Prognosis Score

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: No model exists to predict which patients with elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries will successfully return to play (RTP) after nonoperative treatment. The reported rates for successful RTP after the nonoperative management of UCL injuries are limited and vary widely. Furthermore, patient and injury characteristics that influence the failure of nonoperative treatment have not been established. Purpose: To identify patient- and injury-specific factors predictive of successful RTP after the nonoperative management of UCL injuries in baseball players. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 205 patients with a UCL injury were enrolled from 2010 to 2020. Of these patients, 130 underwent nonoperative treatment and were either cleared for RTP (n = 46) or eventually underwent a surgical intervention (n = 84) after a minimum 1-month trial of nonoperative management. The Elbow UCL Injury Prognosis Score is a close approximation of a logistic regression model that was developed by recursively selecting features using a combination of the backward stepwise and best subset methods. The criteria considered for feature selection included P values using the Fisher exact test, variable importance from intermediary logistic models, and accuracy and sensitivity of the final model. The final logistic model was tested and validated using 5-fold cross-validation, and the score was validated against the logistic model. Results: The Elbow UCL Injury Prognosis Score provided an individualized prediction of each patient's need for surgery based on age, magnetic resonance imaging findings, and paresthesia of the fifth digit. The final model achieved an average accuracy of 78.7% and a consistently perfect sensitivity and negative predictive value on the test dataset. The area under the curve was 0.86. A simplified score to allow for calculation at the bedside was created by standardizing the weights from the logistic equation of the final model. The lower the score, the more likely that patients would successfully RTP without surgery. Conclusion: The Elbow UCL Injury Prognosis Score was created to predict which patients would succeed with nonoperative management and avoid unnecessary surgery while simultaneously identifying patients for whom nonoperative management would delay the inevitable need for a surgical intervention. Patients with a score ≥8 had a >80% chance of requiring surgery. Overall, the Elbow UCL Injury Prognosis Score is a statistically rigorous and practical tool that can be used at the bedside to help counsel patients on their chances of needing surgery.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
The Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury Prognosis Score
Date Crossref
05/09/2025
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Elbow and Forearm Trauma TreatmentShoulder Injury and TreatmentTendon Structure and Treatment

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.