Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Conventional Root Canal Irrigation System and Metronidazole, with and without Pro-agitator Tip System, in Primary Anterior Teeth: An In Vivo Study
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
One of the cornerstones of modern endodontic therapies is the irrigants used in disinfecting the root canals.9 Commonly known intracanal irrigants like sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), chlorhexidine gluconate, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, citric acid, a mixture of tetracycline isomer, acid, and detergent (MTAD), hydrogen peroxide, and others have been suggested for irrigation of primary teeth.10 More and more research is now IntroductIonUntreated caries in deciduous teeth affect nearly half a billion children globally.1 Deciduous tooth caries are seen in 46.9% and 39.3% of children between the ages of 1 and 4, and 5 and 9 years, respectively.1 One of the mainstay therapies in mutilated primary teeth is pulpectomy.Endodontic procedures differ from adult treatments as the roots of primary teeth have intricate anatomy.The effectiveness of biomechanical preparation is reduced in primary molar roots as they are widely divergent, curved, and fragile roots with limited access.[2][3][4] Failure of endodontic therapy in primary teeth is often due to bacteria that persist in the apical regions of obturated teeth's root canals.5 Bigger voids in the medullary bone facilitate the spread of infection in children.6 Other sequelae of caries are space infections, fever, otitis media, and cavernous sinus thrombosis.For the success of the pulp therapy, adequate cleaning and disinfection have to be achieved.Thus, elimination of bacteria from the root canals becomes the primar y objective of endodontic treatment in primary teeth, achieved by chemomechanical preparations.7 Research indicates that primary root canals requiring retreatment have a polymicrobial infection with a preponderance of anaerobic organisms, the most common being Enterococcus faecalis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Conventional Root Canal Irrigation System and Metronidazole, with and without Pro-agitator Tip System, in Primary Anterior Teeth: An In Vivo Study
- Date Crossref
- 04/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Department of Pedodontics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Pedodontics — Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University).
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.