Mechanical Properties Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy Help Evaluate Different Constructions of Re-engineered Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Models
Résumé fourni par la source
Despite the success of chimeric antigen receptor–T (CAR-T) in hematological malignancies, challenges persist, including limited efficacy in solid tumors, on–off tumor toxicity, and CAR-T cell persistence. Cellular mechanics profoundly influence cell behavior and function, yet the biophysical aspects of CAR-T cells remain underexplored. Here, we investigate various CAR molecules incorporating CD19 or CD123 recognition domains. We assess their in vitro cytotoxicity against cancer cells expressing CD19 and/or CD123 and evaluate their in vivo efficacy in mouse models. Notably, single-specific CAR-T cells targeting CD19 or CD123 exhibit potent cytotoxicity, while dual-target CAR-T cells─arranged in parallel or in crossing series─yield optimal outcomes in animal experiments. Through atomic force microscopy (AFM), we uncover a negative correlation between the binding forces of CAR-T cells and antigens and the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in animal experiments in our five dual CAR-expressing CAR-T cells. We proposed that lower binding forces lead to a faster CAR-T cell effect and detachment, enhancing killing efficiency. Our findings underscore the significance of binding forces in CAR-T cell function, highlighting the role of cellular mechanics in guiding the design and evaluation of CAR-T therapies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Mechanical Properties Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy Help Evaluate Different Constructions of Re-engineered Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Models
- Date Crossref
- 05/09/2025
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.