Total-Arterial Revascularization Is Superior in Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction—A Propensity Score Matched Retrospective Multicenter Analysis
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Total arterial revascularization (TAR) may improve outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods: We retrospectively screened 574 adults with HFrEF (LVEF < 40%) undergoing isolated CABG across four German centers (2017–2023). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 240 patients were analyzed (120 TAR vs. 120 NTAR). The primary endpoint was in-hospital MACCE (death, MI, stroke). Key secondary endpoints included ICU/hospital length-of-stay, ventilation time, delirium, transfusion requirements, and acute kidney injury. Results: MACCE occurred in 4.1% (TAR) vs. 14.2% (NTAR) (p = 0.007). TAR was associated with shorter ICU stay (median 44.5 h vs. 90 h, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (10 d vs. 12 d, p = 0.002), reduced ventilation time (8 h vs. 12 h, p < 0.001), lower delirium (5.0% vs. 14.2%, p = 0.016), and fewer RBC transfusions intra-operatively (0.13 ± 0.45 vs. 0.31 ± 0.58 units, p = 0.028) and during the entire stay (0.70 ± 1.33 vs. 1.77 ± 2.91 units, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this multicenter propensity-matched cohort, TAR was associated with lower in-hospital MACCE and more favorable perioperative outcomes compared with NTAR. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm causality and long-term benefits.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Total-Arterial Revascularization Is Superior in Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction—A Propensity Score Matched Retrospective Multicenter Analysis
- Date Crossref
- 05/09/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.