Estimation of population proportion and sensitivity level of a qualitative character using unrelated question randomized response model
Résumé fourni par la source
In survey sampling, it is still a great challenge to estimate the proportion of a sensitive characteristic in a population with the assurance of protecting respondent anonymity. Efficiency and privacy protection are key challenges in classical randomized response methods, particularly when applied to sensitive traits. In a bid to overcome this challenge, we propose a more enhanced randomized response model that enhances respondent privacy protection as well as the accuracy of the estimates. Utilizing stratified random sample methods, our model generalizes the use of the pioneering work. Apart from providing unbiased estimators for the sensitive proportion, the proposed model introduces a better sensitivity measure. We demonstrate via theoretical proofs and numerical simulations that our scheme is more efficient and secure compared to existing methods. Our proposed estimator, in specific, has a notably higher percentage relative efficiency (PRE) compared to existing models for both simple and stratified random sampling for certain parameter values, with significant respondent privacy protection and estimating accuracy gains. It is found that, compared to existing methods, the proposed models offer respondents greater efficiency and better privacy protection. Due to these advancements, our approach is particularly beneficial for social and behavioral research where privacy protection is important.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Estimation of population proportion and sensitivity level of a qualitative character using unrelated question randomized response model
- Date Crossref
- 04/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.