Research paper efficacy and safety of telitacicept combined with standard therapy for lupus nephritis: a single-center real-world study
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus with suboptimal response to standard therapy. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of telitacicept, a novel fusion protein targeting both BLyS and APRIL, combined with standard therapy in patients with active LN. Methods: This retrospective study included 67 patients with biopsy-proven LN treated with telitacicept plus standard therapy between January 2022-July 2024. Primary endpoints included renal response rates, SRI-4, and safety at weeks 12, 24, and 52. Findings: Complete and partial renal response rates were 41.8%/26.9% at week 12 (n=67), 48.9%/34.0% at week 24 (n=47), and 56.3%/37.5% at week 52 (n=16). SRI-4 response rates increased from 55.2% at week 12 to 75.0% at week 52 (p=0.035 for trend). Proteinuria decreased significantly from 2.69g/24h at baseline to 0.51g/24h at week 24 (p<0.001). Median prednisone dose decreased from 40mg at baseline to 7.5mg at week 52 (p<0.001). Thirteen adverse events occurred with no serious events reported. Interpretation: Telitacicept combined with standard therapy demonstrated significant efficacy in LN with an acceptable safety profile, achieving high response rates, reduced proteinuria, improved immunological parameters, and substantial glucocorticoid-sparing effects.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Research paper efficacy and safety of telitacicept combined with standard therapy for lupus nephritis: a single-center real-world study
- Date Crossref
- 02/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.