Frequency Coding of Multisensory Integration in the Local Field Potentials of the Medial Pulvinar
Résumé fourni par la source
The pulvinar is a posterior thalamic nucleus, with a heterogeneous anatomo-functional organization. It is divided into four parts, including the medial pulvinar, which is densely connected with primary unisensory and multisensory cortical regions, and subcortical structures, including the superior colliculus. Based on this connectivity, the medial pulvinar may play an important role in sensory processing and multisensory integration. However, its contribution to multisensory integration has rarely been directly investigated. To fill this knowledge gap, two macaque monkeys were trained on a fixation task, during which auditory, visual, and audiovisual stimuli were presented. We characterize local field potentials of the medial pulvinar associated with these stimuli. In the temporal domain, we describe an early and a late period showing multisensory integration, both dominated by sub-additive processes (the audiovisual response is inferior to the sum of the unisensory responses). In the frequency domain, multisensory integration, mostly sub-additive, is predominant in the lower frequencies (90% of recorded signals in 4.5-8.5 Hz and 96% in 8.5-20 Hz). Prevalence largely decreases in high frequencies (54% in 35-60 Hz, 37% in 60-120 Hz). This suggests that the medial pulvinar is a multisensory hub, integrating visual and auditory information in different frequency bands and contributing to cortico-pulvino-cortical multisensory computational loops.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Frequency Coding of Multisensory Integration in the Local Field Potentials of the Medial Pulvinar
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.