Long-term benefits of autologous stem cell transplantation versus intensive chemotherapy consolidation for acute myeloid leukemia patients: A propensity score matching analysis from the PETHEMA AML registry
Rattachement africain : es, cl, co, uy. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
While allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the preferred consolidation for high and most intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in first remission, the role of autologous SCT (auto-SCT) vs. chemotherapy (CT) when allo-SCT is not feasible or indicated, remains controversial. We conducted a real-world, retrospective cohort study using the PETHEMA AML registry to compare auto-SCT and CT. Multivariate Cox regression and propensity score matching (PS-matching) were used to adjust for confounding factors. A total of 1272 patients in first remission and who received 2 consolidation courses were included (615 receiving additional CT cycles and 657 undergoing auto-SCT). Overall, 78.08% of auto-SCT patients were diagnosed before 2017, compared to 38.11% in the CT cohort (p < 0.001). In the overall cohort, auto-SCT was associated with significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.73, p < 0.001) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR: 0.73, p < 0.001). This benefit was particularly evident in patients ≤65 years, those with normal karyotype, and FLT3-ITD negativity. In the PS-matched cohort, the RFS advantage persisted (HR: 0.80, p = 0.092), but OS differences were not statistically significant (HR: 0.91, p = 0.563). The role of auto-SCT in the genomic and targeted agent era should not be discarded.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Long-term benefits of autologous stem cell transplantation versus intensive chemotherapy consolidation for acute myeloid leukemia patients: A propensity score matching analysis from the PETHEMA AML registry
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.