Challenges in diagnosis of sarcoidosis

Résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diagnosing sarcoidosis remains challenging. Histology findings and a variable clinical presentation can mimic other infectious, malignant, and autoimmune diseases. This review synthesizes current evidence on histopathology, sampling techniques, imaging modalities, and biomarkers and explores how emerging 'omics' and artificial intelligence tools may sharpen diagnostic accuracy. RECENT FINDINGS: Within the typical granulomatous lesions, limited or 'burned-out' necrosis is an ancillary finding, which can be present in up to one-third of sarcoid biopsies, and demands a careful differential diagnostic work-up. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of lymph nodes has replaced mediastinoscopy as first-line sampling tool, while cryobiopsy is still under validation. Volumetric PET metrics such as total lung glycolysis and somatostatin-receptor tracers refine activity assessment; combined FDG PET/MRI improves detection of occult cardiac disease. Advanced bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) immunophenotyping via flow cytometry and serum, BAL, and genetic biomarkers show to correlate with inflammatory burden but have low diagnostic value. Multi-omics signatures and Positron Emission Tomography with Computer Tomography radiomics, supported by deep-learning algorithms, show promising results for noninvasive diagnostic confirmation, phenotyping, and disease monitoring. SUMMARY: No single test is conclusive for diagnosing sarcoidosis. An integrated, multidisciplinary strategy is needed. Large, multicenter, and multiethnic studies are essential to translate and validate data from emerging AI tools and -omics research into clinical routine.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.