Distinctive clinical and radiological characteristics of persistent super‐multiple ground‐glass pulmonary nodules
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The clinical characteristics and pathophysiological processes of super-multiple ground-glass nodules (GGNs) remain poorly understood due to their rare incidence. This retrospective-prospective study aimed to elucidate these aspects by analyzing 75 patients with "super-multiple GGNs," having more than five persistent nodules, each measuring at least 5 mm, identified from a larger cohort of 2589 patients. We compared these patients with those having solitary GGNs (N = 691) and 2-5 GGNs (N = 458) to evaluate clinical and radiological characteristics. All patients underwent a minimum 12-month follow-up with detailed documentation of nodule changes and treatments. Patients with super-multiple GGNs were significantly older, predominantly female, had lower smoking rates, and showed higher smog exposure and cough prevalence than other patients (p < .05). Radiologically, super-multiple GGNs appeared mostly unilaterally, predominantly in the right lung and upper lobes (p < .001). Progression occurred in 33.3% of these patients, of whom 44.0% exhibited simultaneous growth of multiple nodules. Compared with solitary GGNs (HR = 6.64, 95% CI = 3.18-13.84, p < .001) and 2-5 GGNs (HR = 3.26, 95% CI = 1.67-6.31, p < .001), super-multiple GGNs carried significantly higher progression risk. These findings highlight the distinct clinical characteristics and radiological evolutionary patterns of super-multiple GGNs, suggesting possible links to pulmonary inflammation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Distinctive clinical and radiological characteristics of persistent super‐multiple ground‐glass pulmonary nodules
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.