Epigenetic markers of lithium response in bipolar disorder: optimization of a Methylation-Sensitive High-Resolution Melting assay (MS-HRM) and relevance in combination with clinical factors
Résumé fourni par la source
Lithium (Li) is the most frequently recommended first-line treatment in bipolar disorder (BD). Nevertheless, response to Li is highly variable between individuals and no clinical or biological biomarkers have been consistently associated to long-term response. We previously identified 3 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) that discriminated good from non-responders to Li. In this study, we validated 4 additional DMRs using Methylation Specific High-Resolution Melting (MS-HRM), a PCR-based low-cost method with easy transferability from bench to bedside. In 61 individuals with BD-I, we investigated associations between these 7 DMRs and Li response, alone or combined with demographic and clinical variables. Using 7 DMRs and 6 demographic and clinical variables, 90 % of the BD-I individuals were correctly classified according to their response status (AUC = 0.95). In particular, combining DNA methylation markers with clinical predictors improved the identification of non-responders (83 % correctly classified). This epigenetic signature might be useful in clinical practice especially as it is imperative to avoid exposing individuals to Li if they have a very low likelihood of response.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Epigenetic markers of lithium response in bipolar disorder: optimization of a Methylation-Sensitive High-Resolution Melting assay (MS-HRM) and relevance in combination with clinical factors
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.