Pregnant Mothers Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Oral Health: A Cross-Sectional Study
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Aim: Maternal oral health significantly influences both maternal and fetal outcomes, yet awareness and preventive practices remain suboptimal in many regions. This study was aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding oral health among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 300 pregnant women using a structured, pre-validated questionnaire covering demographic data and KAP items. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and cross-tabulations were used to analyze associations between sociodemographic variables and KAP components. Results: Among the participants, 62% demonstrated moderate knowledge, 70% had a positive attitude, but only 40% reported good oral health practices. Educational level and prior dental visits were significantly associated with higher knowledge and better practices ( P < 0.05). While the majority acknowledged the importance of oral health during pregnancy, routine dental visits were uncommon due to fear, cost, or lack of awareness. No multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for confounders. Conclusion: Despite a generally positive attitude, knowledge and practice regarding oral health among pregnant women remain inadequate. Integration of oral health education into antenatal care services and targeted interventions for high-risk groups are essential to improve maternal and child oral health outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pregnant Mothers Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Oral Health: A Cross-Sectional Study
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.