Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Eco-Environmental Quality and Driving Factors in China’s Three-North Shelter Forest Program Using GEE and GIS
Résumé fourni par la source
The long-term sustainability of conservation efforts in critical reforestation regions requires timely, spatiotemporal assessments of ecological quality. In alignment with China’s environmental initiatives, this study integrates Google Earth Engine (GEE) and MODIS data to construct an enhanced Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) for two decades of ecological monitoring. Hotspot analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*) revealed concentrated high-quality zones, particularly in Xinjiang’s Altay Prefecture, with ‘Good’ and ‘Excellent’ areas increasing from 21.64% in 2000 to 31.30% in 2020. To uncover driving forces, partial correlation and geographic detector analyses identified a transition in the Three-North Shelter Forest Program (TNSFP) from climate–topography constraints to land use–climate synergy, with land use emerging as the dominant factor. Socioeconomic influences, shaped by policy interventions, also played an important but fluctuating role. This progression—from natural constraints to active human regulation—underscores the need for climate-adaptive land use, balanced ecological–economic development, and region-specific governance. These findings validate the effectiveness of current conservation strategies and provide guidance for sustaining ecological progress and optimizing future development in the TNSFP.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Eco-Environmental Quality and Driving Factors in China’s Three-North Shelter Forest Program Using GEE and GIS
- Date Crossref
- 26/08/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.