Metagenomic Assembled Genomes of a Pseudanabaena Cyanobacterium and Six Heterotrophic Strains from a Xenic Culture
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Sequencing cyanobacteria from xenic cultures is often challenging when their DNA extracts are confounded by DNA from their heterotrophic microbiome. Using an iterative DNA lysis protocol can fractionate between DNA from the cyanobacterium and the heterotrophic strains. To further demonstrate the utility of this protocol, it was used to sequence another xenic culture of cyanobacteria. This effort led to the assembly of a megabase-length cyanobacterial chromosome; however, repeated ribosomal regions created assembly issues even after adding data from another sequencing run to improve coverage. A separate DNA preparation from a single cell lysis step was also run for comparison but yielded a markedly lower proportion of cyanobacterial reads (<2%). Instead, the circular cyanobacterial chromosome was closed with targeted amplicon sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis assigned this strain to the genus Pseudanabaena. Within the metagenomic assembly were the genomes of six heterotrophic strains, preliminarily assigned as belonging to the genera Acidovorax, Hydrogenophaga, Lysobacter, Novosphingobium, Sediminicoccus, and Tabrizicola. Lysobacter sp. BL-A-41-H3’s chromosome was also assembled as a closed circular contig. This study demonstrates that iterative lysis enriches for cyanobacterial DNA and enables concurrent genome assembly of cohabitating heterotrophs alongside the host cyanobacterium.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Metagenomic Assembled Genomes of a Pseudanabaena Cyanobacterium and Six Heterotrophic Strains from a Xenic Culture
- Date Crossref
- 27/08/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.