Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Tolerability and Efficacy of Maribavir vs. Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Prophylaxis in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: Study Protocol

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a significant problem in kidney transplantation despite advances in screening, monitoring, therapeutics, and management. Although universal prophylaxis with antiviral therapy has significantly reduced the risk of early CMV infection and disease, late-onset CMV is still common and can be difficult to clinically manage in high-risk patients. A recent systematic review showed that with antiviral prophylaxis, early CMV infection occurred in only 6% of kidney recipients, and late infection occurred in more than one in six patients. The two antiviral prophylaxis medications this study is comparing, valganciclovir (VGC) and maribavir, are highly effective at preventing CMV infection. In studies using valganciclovir, the reported occurrence of leukopenia is 20%-40%, and neutropenia is 10%-30%. In studies using maribavir, the reported occurrence of neutropenia was 4%-5% versus 15%-18% in valganciclovir patients. With appropriate dosing, maribavir appears to have similar efficacy to valganciclovir in treating current and preventing future CMV infection with a significantly reduced rate of neutropenia. Methods Maribavir IIR is a 12-month, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial enrolling 70 patients (35 in each arm) examining the difference in preventing CMV infection while specifically assessing the tolerability of the two antiviral prophylactic medications. The trial is currently in the follow-up phase, with the first patient enrolled in November 2023 and enrollment concluding in June 2024. Discussion The primary objective of this study is to assess the tolerability of maribavir versus valganciclovir (VGC) prophylaxis in adult kidney transplant recipients at high risk of CMV infection (D+/R- or thymo use if R+). This was done by assessing the incidence of leukopenia in the two arms, the occurrence of CMV infection despite prophylaxis, the impact of these medications on healthcare utilization and costs, and any outcome differences associated with race and sex. In this preliminary report, we describe the study design, methods, aims, and outcome measures that will be utilized in the ongoing Maribavir IIR clinical trial. Trial registration The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06034925: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06034925.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Tolerability and Efficacy of Maribavir vs. Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Prophylaxis in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: Study Protocol
Date Crossref
27/08/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus researchPolyomavirus and related diseasesHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.