Identification of prognostic liquid biopsy biomarkers in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with cemiplimab
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: The treatment of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (CSCC) has undergone significant changes with the introduction of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). While promising results have been observed, their efficacy remains limited to a subset of patients. Soluble immune checkpoint molecules, Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) could serve as potential biomarkers, particularly in ICI-based therapies. METHODS: In this study, we assessed the prognostic role of serum PD-L1, LAG-3, TIM-3, CTLA-4, IFN-γ, and plasma cfDNA in a cohort of 41 advanced (locally-advanced or metastatic) CSCC patients treated with the anti-PD-1 inhibitor cemiplimab. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that elevated baseline serum levels of IFN-γ are significantly associated with poorer treatment response and shorter Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in patients receiving cemiplimab. Moreover, patients with worse outcomes in terms of response and PFS exhibited a post-treatment decrease in IFN-γ levels. Higher baseline levels of plasma cfDNA and serum CTLA-4 demonstrated a trend toward association with unfavourable clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the potential of baseline and post-treatment IFN-γ levels as significant prognostic indicators for advanced CSCC patients undergoing cemiplimab therapy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Identification of prognostic liquid biopsy biomarkers in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with cemiplimab
- Date Crossref
- 27/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.