Addressing Mental Health Needs After a Public Health Crisis in Southern Switzerland: Stakeholders’ Perspectives
Rattachement africain : ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objectives: This paper examines a stakeholder engagement initiative to develop public health recommendations for addressing mental health gaps after the COVID-19 pandemic in southern Switzerland. It explores local healthcare professionals' experiences with the pandemic's impact on mental health and service use. Methods: We used a stakeholder dialogue methodology based on participatory research. After mapping, we selected participants based on their power and interest on the subject. Data were gathered through two structured dialogues. We conducted thematic content analysis to identify and interpret patterns within dialogues. We used multi-step coding to assign codes to text segments, grouping similar patterns into themes and subthemes while ensuring consistency and exclusivity. Results: Thirty-two healthcare stakeholders from diverse sectors across urban and rural southern Switzerland participated in the dialogues. They emphasized flexible mental health service restructuring to address evolving patient needs and advocated for stronger prevention and promotion efforts, especially for vulnerable groups. Conclusion: Engaging local healthcare stakeholders turned up as an effective strategy to derive public health recommendations to improve mental health prevention and promotion along with the access and use of related services.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Addressing Mental Health Needs After a Public Health Crisis in Southern Switzerland: Stakeholders’ Perspectives
- Date Crossref
- 27/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.