Metals Exposures and Telomere Length as a Marker of DNA Damage Among Electronic Waste Workers and a Reference Group
Rattachement africain : Ghana, jp, us, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Informal E-waste recycling releases complex mixtures including heavy metals that bioaccumulate in exposed populations, including e-waste workers. Emerging evidence suggests that these metals contribute to telomere attrition, leading to cellular aging and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). This study investigated the longitudinal impact of repeated metal exposures on telomere length among e-waste workers in Ghana. A total of 78 study participants (53 e-waste workers and 25 reference group) were included in the study. Blood and urine samples were used for 3- repeated measurements of telomere length using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Using restricted cubic spline modelling, the study observed shorter telomere length among the e-waste workers compared to the reference group, and this was more evident among the burners within the e-waste workers population. There was a negative association between Pb, Cr levels, and telomere length. Zn was positively associated with telomere length, while a nonlinear association was observed between Mg levels and telomere length. The consistently shorter relative telomere length among e-waste workers coinciding with higher concentrations of Cr and Pb, implicates the role of metals in telomere shortening. Future research should utilize longer follow-up longitudinal studies with a larger sample size to confirm these findings.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Metals Exposures and Telomere Length as a Marker of DNA Damage Among Electronic Waste Workers and a Reference Group
- Date Crossref
- 26/08/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.