Tumor-derived PRMT1 suppresses macrophage antitumor activity by inhibiting cGAS/STING signaling in gastric cancer cells
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Gastric cancer (GC) is a common and aggressive malignancy worldwide. Increasing evidence has shown that epigenetic changes are closely related to the development of cancer and tumor-associated macrophages. Here, we report that PRMT1 is a key immunosuppressive factor in GC. PRMT1 is upregulated in GC and promotes tumor progression. PRMT1 knockdown in GC leads to the activation of the cGAS/STING pathway through the enhancement of dsDNA aggregation, which subsequently increases IFN-β secretion. Notably, after PRMT1 knockdown, M1-like tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) infiltration increased, whereas M2-like TAM infiltration decreased in vivo and in vitro. After the targeted inhibition of STING by siRNA or H151, the improvement in the progression of GC caused by PRMT1 knockdown decreased, and the changes in macrophage polarization were reversed. Furthermore, we found that PRMT1 knockdown in GC affects the STAT pathway in TAMs, inducing changes in their polarization and promoting GC apoptosis by enhancing IFN-β secretion through the cGAS/STING pathway. In summary, our findings revealed that PRMT1 knockdown inhibits the cGAS/STING pathway in GC, which produces type I IFNs to promote the polarization of M1-like macrophages in the tumor microenvironment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Tumor-derived PRMT1 suppresses macrophage antitumor activity by inhibiting cGAS/STING signaling in gastric cancer cells
- Date Crossref
- 26/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.