Atrial Myopathy and Heart Failure: Immunomolecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Heart failure (HF) remains a major global health challenge defined by the inability of the heart to adequately meet systemic metabolic requirements. While ventricular dysfunction has traditionally been the primary focus in both conceptual and clinical frameworks of HF, emerging evidence highlights atrial myopathy-covering structural, functional, electrical, metabolic, and neurohormonal remodeling-as a central yet often overlooked contributor to disease progression across the HF spectrum. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying atrial remodeling, with a focus on inflammation and innate immune activation as key pathogenic mediators. Among pattern recognition receptors, Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and NOD-like receptors (NLRs) play crucial roles in translating myocardial stress into pro-inflammatory, profibrotic, and pro-arrhythmic signals that exacerbate HF. By combining experimental and clinical evidence, we emphasize atrial myopathy as both a biomarker and an active driver of HF deterioration, advocating for the inclusion of atrial-targeted diagnostics and immunomodulatory therapies in future HF treatment approaches. Such a paradigm shift holds significant potential for improved risk stratification, arrhythmia prevention, attenuation of structural remodeling, and ultimately, better prognosis and clinical outcomes in this increasingly common syndrome.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Atrial Myopathy and Heart Failure: Immunomolecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications
- Date Crossref
- 24/08/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.